<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Media Becoming a Commodity?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingtrenches.com/marketing-sales/is-media-becoming-a-commodity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingtrenches.com/marketing-sales/is-media-becoming-a-commodity/</link>
	<description>&#124; Internet Marketing Blog, Marketing Blog &#124; Right Source Marketing</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 18:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike Sweeney</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingtrenches.com/marketing-sales/is-media-becoming-a-commodity/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Sweeney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 18:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingtrenches.com/?p=23#comment-67</guid>
		<description>Excellent clarification Chris, and great example with the sports properties.  As consumers, we choose and use ESPN, SI, and TSN for different reasons and to get different material.  It IS the MEDIA ADVERTISING component which is becoming commoditized.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent clarification Chris, and great example with the sports properties.  As consumers, we choose and use ESPN, SI, and TSN for different reasons and to get different material.  It IS the MEDIA ADVERTISING component which is becoming commoditized.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: csorrow</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingtrenches.com/marketing-sales/is-media-becoming-a-commodity/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>csorrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 21:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingtrenches.com/?p=23#comment-64</guid>
		<description>To be precise, MEDIA isn't a commodity.  MEDIA ADVERTISING is.  From my perspective as a reader, ESPN magazine, Sports Illustrated, and The Sporting News are all very distinct (I personally prefer TSN).  As an adverstiser trying to reach sports-oriented males between the ages of 25 and 45, though, it's a quasi-commodity, or at least a quasi-commodity--I'm just paying for views.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be precise, MEDIA isn&#8217;t a commodity.  MEDIA ADVERTISING is.  From my perspective as a reader, ESPN magazine, Sports Illustrated, and The Sporting News are all very distinct (I personally prefer TSN).  As an adverstiser trying to reach sports-oriented males between the ages of 25 and 45, though, it&#8217;s a quasi-commodity, or at least a quasi-commodity&#8211;I&#8217;m just paying for views.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
