<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are You Really LinkedIn?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingtrenches.com/marketing-strategy/are-you-really-linkedin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingtrenches.com/marketing-strategy/are-you-really-linkedin/</link>
	<description>The Marketing Trenches blog is designed to provide marketers &#38; business executives with concrete examples of successful marketing strategies &#38; tactics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 13:05:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike Sweeney</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingtrenches.com/marketing-strategy/are-you-really-linkedin/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Sweeney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 18:38:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingtrenches.com/?p=14#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Excellent comment - I get similar responses from some of my B2B clients.  Strangely enough, it reminds of the comments I got 5-6 years ago from execs who refused to believe that search engine marketing could ever represent an effective lead generation vehicle.  The comments ring in my ears even today, &quot;Executives don&#039;t use Google to find complex or sophisticated software or technology solutions.&quot;  Right.  The same people that made those comments now spend a bulk of their marketing budgets on search engine lead generation programs.

I completely agree with you on the idea that certain &quot;gritty&quot; B2B category executives may not benefit from web-based networking tools.  Category definitely matters.  That being said, I think the generation/age of the user matters as well.  While you might not find a lot of &gt; 60 C-level types using LinkedIn, it&#039;s rare that I don&#039;t find LinkedIn profiles on the &lt; 50 C-level types, at least in the &quot;younger&quot;, or perhaps &quot;less gritty&quot; industries.

Since this original post, I&#039;ve seen LinkedIn get more and more crowded.  More people answering questions even though they&#039;re not really qualified to answer questions.  More people joining groups that don&#039;t exactly fit their profile.  More folks posting status updates covering meaningless items.  LinkedIn remains a fantastic tool if you know how to use it, but I worry about the abuse factor that occurs in any community that goes &quot;unmanaged&quot; for the most part.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent comment &#8211; I get similar responses from some of my B2B clients.  Strangely enough, it reminds of the comments I got 5-6 years ago from execs who refused to believe that search engine marketing could ever represent an effective lead generation vehicle.  The comments ring in my ears even today, &#8220;Executives don&#8217;t use Google to find complex or sophisticated software or technology solutions.&#8221;  Right.  The same people that made those comments now spend a bulk of their marketing budgets on search engine lead generation programs.</p>
<p>I completely agree with you on the idea that certain &#8220;gritty&#8221; B2B category executives may not benefit from web-based networking tools.  Category definitely matters.  That being said, I think the generation/age of the user matters as well.  While you might not find a lot of > 60 C-level types using LinkedIn, it&#8217;s rare that I don&#8217;t find LinkedIn profiles on the < 50 C-level types, at least in the &#8220;younger&#8221;, or perhaps &#8220;less gritty&#8221; industries.</p>
<p>Since this original post, I&#8217;ve seen LinkedIn get more and more crowded.  More people answering questions even though they&#8217;re not really qualified to answer questions.  More people joining groups that don&#8217;t exactly fit their profile.  More folks posting status updates covering meaningless items.  LinkedIn remains a fantastic tool if you know how to use it, but I worry about the abuse factor that occurs in any community that goes &#8220;unmanaged&#8221; for the most part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katherine Ventres Canipelli</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingtrenches.com/marketing-strategy/are-you-really-linkedin/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Katherine Ventres Canipelli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 12:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingtrenches.com/?p=14#comment-11</guid>
		<description>Since several execs among my industrial B2B clients have done exactly this -- created but not populated their LinkedIn profiles or avoided LinkedIn altogether -- I polled them recently to understand why.  #1 reason: FEAR.  Two types -- discomfort with things not quite understood and concern about exposing their contacts.  #2 reason: I NETWORK WITH CEOs AND THEY&#039;RE NOT USING LINKEDIN.

You may recoil at this -- but in many segments, the C-suite isn&#039;t active yet. Or at least not as contributors, so it&#039;s opaque.  With exec suite demographics about to undergo disruptive change in the coming years, it&#039;s no stretch to predict that tomorrow&#039;s executive suite leaders will use social networking tools for myriad purposes.

Of course, there are gritty B2B markets that won&#039;t benefit that much from social tools applied to business processes.  Not many, though, when one considers the potential value of supply chain collaboration built on simple social communications tools.

We&#039;re limited only by the limits of imagination and commitment to improvement.

Katherine
www.twitter.com/kvcanipelli</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since several execs among my industrial B2B clients have done exactly this &#8212; created but not populated their LinkedIn profiles or avoided LinkedIn altogether &#8212; I polled them recently to understand why.  #1 reason: FEAR.  Two types &#8212; discomfort with things not quite understood and concern about exposing their contacts.  #2 reason: I NETWORK WITH CEOs AND THEY&#8217;RE NOT USING LINKEDIN.</p>
<p>You may recoil at this &#8212; but in many segments, the C-suite isn&#8217;t active yet. Or at least not as contributors, so it&#8217;s opaque.  With exec suite demographics about to undergo disruptive change in the coming years, it&#8217;s no stretch to predict that tomorrow&#8217;s executive suite leaders will use social networking tools for myriad purposes.</p>
<p>Of course, there are gritty B2B markets that won&#8217;t benefit that much from social tools applied to business processes.  Not many, though, when one considers the potential value of supply chain collaboration built on simple social communications tools.</p>
<p>We&#8217;re limited only by the limits of imagination and commitment to improvement.</p>
<p>Katherine<br />
<a href="http://www.twitter.com/kvcanipelli" rel="nofollow">http://www.twitter.com/kvcanipelli</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
